Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Travelers' Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 8, 1889PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. Charles H. Phelps, Judge. Action to recover an amount alleged to be due on a policy of insurance issued by defendant. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

On the twenty-first day of April, 1887, the defendant issued the policy in suit. The portions of that policy important for consideration on this appeal are as follows: “The Travelers’ Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., in consideration of the warranties in the application for this policy, and of an order (for moneys therein specified) on Chicago, Burlington . and Quincy Railroad Company, does hereby insure (subject to conditions on back hereof, not waivable by agents) John McMahon, stone-mason, for the period or periods specified below, beginning at noon of the day this policy is dated, *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Bane v. Travelers' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  2. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp. v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. ReamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Landis v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Reed v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API