Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Ashford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Ogemaw; Sharpe, J. Trespass by Humphrey Shaw against Charles N. Ash-ford, commenced by capias ad respondendum. From an order dismissing the writ, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Defendant was arrested upon a capias ad respondendum issued upon an affidavit reading as follows:

Affidavit for Capias.

“ George K. Newcombe, being duly sworn, on his oath says that he is agent and attorney for Humphrey Shaw, of the city of Saginaw, in said State, and makes this affidavit in his behalf. Deponent further says that on or about the 1st day of May, 1894, and on divers other days and times since that day, at the township of Horton, in said county, one Charles N. Ashford, of s¿iid township, with force and arms, and contrary to the provisions of section 1 of chapter 198 of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Sheridan v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ring v. BurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Stensrud v. DelamaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. DeLong v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. McGaheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Flint v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Church v. Calhoun Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Robinson v. Branch Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API