Simeon v. Cramm
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract against Edward P. Gramm and N. M. Hatch on a bond to dissolve an attachment. Trial in the Superior Court, before Allen, J., without a jury, who found for the plaintiff and allowed a bill of exceptions, the substance of which appears in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Morton J.
The material facts in this case are as follows • George F. Seavey and Charles E. Seavey sued out of the Municipal Court of the city of Boston a writ against H. C. Lougee *493and E. P. Cramm in which James Simeon, the present plaintiff, was summoned as trustee. The writ was dated August 8, 1874, and was, by what appears to have been a clerical error, made returnable on September 29, 1874, a day on which there was no term of the Municipal Court, instead of August 29, 1874, the day upon which all parties understood the writ to be returnable. On August 10, 1874, the defendants in this suit…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Union Savings Bank v. CameronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Ferguson & Co. v. MelilloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Bray v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
- Harris v. BarkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- Union Savings Bank v. CameronMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.