Legal Opinion
Dumas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 18, 1921No. A-3663PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.
(after stating the facts as above). It is first contended that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the amended information. In the brief and also orally counsel advanced the argument that the information is duplicitous.
The charging part of the information is as follows:
“That Houston Dumas and J. D. Moore did, in Choctaw county, state of Oklahoma, on or about the 15th day of February, 1918, and anterior to the presentment hereof, commit the crime of arson, in the manner and form as follows, to wit: Then and there, in Choctaw county, state of Oklahoma, in the town of Soper, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- State v. ColgateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Early v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Woodford v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roulston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Doser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Rudolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.