Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 1959No. 90, Docket 25056PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 147, 149; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schroeder Bros., Inc., Libellants-Appellees v. The Saturnia and Italia Societa Anonima Di Navigazione, Claimant-Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- A. H. Bull Steamship Company, Owner of the Elizabeth, Libelant and v. The Exanthia and Its Owner, American Export Lines, Inc., and Cross-LibelantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armour & Company, Libelant-Appellee v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959