Legal Opinion
Tereshchuk v. Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Myron Tereshchuk, a prisoner, brings a FOIA claim against the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, alleging that he constructively exhausted his administrative remedies after BOP improperly withheld records sought in three separate requests. The Bureau of Prisons moved to dismiss the supplemental complaint or, alternatively, for summary judgment, arguing that Tereshchuk’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies bars judicial review. Tereshchuk later moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b) 1…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Hidalgo v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ayuda, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jean-Pierre v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Walsh v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Alaniz v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.