Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Byrndun Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFboessel, J.
Julius Epstein, the impleaded defendant herein, moves for an order “ amending the judgment entered herein by reinserting therein the provision stricken therefrom by the Clerk of the court providing for the award of costs to said defendant-impleaded as against ” the Byrndun Corporation, the impleading defendant, “ and directing the Clerk to tax costs as against said defendant and in favor of said defendantimpleaded, Julius Epstein.”
Plaintiff originally sued Byrndun. Thereupon the latter, pursuant to an order granted under subdivision 2 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act, impleaded Julius…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Canavan v. Emze Cosmetic Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Kozlowski v. . GomolskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Michaud v. Banco Nacional de MexicoNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Strudler v. Libray Realty Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1938
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pearlstein v. James J. McCreery & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Ruddi v. Concrete Steel Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1944
- Smith v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Lettieri v. Lefrak Builders, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961