Legal Opinion

In re Hoechst Celanese Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered October 10 and November 19, 1991, which granted respondents’ motion to compel appellant’s compliance with their subpoena to the extent of directing appellant to produce a "developmental history” of its forms used in policies held by respondents, upon condition that respondents first produce copies of the policies in issue, and all documents created by appellant or in its possession relating to the drafting, development, explanation, application and marketing of any of its form insurance policies containing the basic,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Silk v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. RocanovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API