U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Gullotta
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} The court below certified to us this question: “Whether or not each missed payment under a promissory note and mortgage yields a new claim such that any successive actions on the same note and mortgage involve different claims and are thus exempt from the ‘two-dismissal rule’ contained in Civ. R. *40041(A)(1).” In this case, under these facts, we answer the question in the negative.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶2} This matter arises from the third foreclosure action filed by plaintiff-appellee U.S. Bank National Association against defendant-appellant Giuseppe Gullotta. All three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- EMC Mortgage Corp. v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Olynyk v. ScolesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Eden Realty Co. v. Weather-Seal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
- General Development Corp. v. Wilbur-Rogers Atlanta Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hoffmann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Cenlar FSB v. Joseph L. Malenfant, Jr. and Laurie G. MalenfantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Heidi Pushard v. Bank of America N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.