Legal Opinion

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Gullotta

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2008No. 2007-1144PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The court below certified to us this question: “Whether or not each missed payment under a promissory note and mortgage yields a new claim such that any successive actions on the same note and mortgage involve different claims and are thus exempt from the ‘two-dismissal rule’ contained in Civ. R. *40041(A)(1).” In this case, under these facts, we answer the question in the negative.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶2} This matter arises from the third foreclosure action filed by plaintiff-appellee U.S. Bank National Association against defendant-appellant Giuseppe Gullotta. All three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. EMC Mortgage Corp. v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Olynyk v. ScolesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Eden Realty Co. v. Weather-Seal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. General Development Corp. v. Wilbur-Rogers Atlanta Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. State Ex Rel. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Cenlar FSB v. Joseph L. Malenfant, Jr. and Laurie G. MalenfantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. Heidi Pushard v. Bank of America N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API