Legal Opinion

Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver v. Sherman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1941Published

1Opinion

Separate Conourring Opinion.

BLAND, J.

Under the provisions of Section 952, Revised Statutes 1939, the allegation of the reply, setting forth a lack of consideration for the compromise agreement, will be' deemed to have been contro verted at the trial by the defendants ‘ ‘ as upon direct denial or avoidance. ” [See, also Pickel, et al. v. St. Louis Chamber of Commerce Ass’n., 10 Mo. App. 191, 193; Babcock v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, 158 Mo. App. 275.]

Under the provisions of Section 958 Revised Statutes 1939, we take judicial notice of all of the Colorado statutes pleaded (or deemed pleaded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pickel v. St. Louis Chamber of Commerce Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Babcock v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API