Legal Opinion

Mahnkey v. King

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 4, 1971No. 726-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Earl Mahnkey, Jr. brought suit against Hols-claw Brothers, Inc. and four other defendants for damages received in an automobile accident in the state of Washington. Jury verdicts in Mahnkey’s favor were rendered against two of the defendants; however, the jury found in favor of Holsclaw. Holsclaw is an Indiana corporation which manufactures trailers and jurisdiction was obtained in Washington under RCW 4.28.180 and RCW 4.28.185. 1

Following entry of the verdicts, the trial court then heard a motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees urged by Holsclaw pursuant to RCW 4.28.185 (5). The court awarded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Tyee Construction Co. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Northshore School District No. 417 v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. Mogelberg Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Northshore School District No. 417 v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API