Legal Opinion

Bentley v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 21, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Judge.

This is a companion case to Johnson v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Company, Ky., 311 S.W.2d 537. The same type of writing that figured in the Johnson case is presented for construction in this case. The appeal is from a judgment quieting title to the coal in the disputed land in the appellee, Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Company.

In addition to the grounds urged for reversal in the Johnson case, the appellants herein contend that the Broas writing is so indefinite in regard to form and manner of performance as to be void.

It is not necessary to discuss here the questions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API