Hartmann v. Police Dept. of Ridgewood
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
258 N.J. Super. 32 (1992)
609 A.2d 61
IN THE MATTER OF CARL HARTMANN AND STEVEN SMITH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 2, 1992.
Decided July 1, 1992.
Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.
Sydney V. Stoldt, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Stoldt & Horan, attorneys; Cathy J. Pollak, on the brief).
Philip De Vencentes argued the cause for respondent Carl Hartmann (Galantucci & Patuto, attorneys).
William J. Berman argued the cause for respondent Steven R. Smith (Rosen…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zeber AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- In Re Disciplinary Procedures of PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- City of Asbury Park v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- In Re EmmonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Falcone v. De FuriaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Karins v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Bound Brook Board of Education v. Glenn Ciripompa (076905)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Grubb v. Borough of HightstownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- State v. HupkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Pepe v. Township of SpringfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.