Nahe v. Bauer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Bertha E. Hahe, individually and as . administratrix, etc., from a judgment of- the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant Clark D. Rhinehart, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of- Queens on the 19th day of January, 1910, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Queens County 'Special Term, dismissing the complaint upon the' merits. . ' . '
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas, J.:
Mrs. Fint, a surviving trustee under a will,' held two bonds and mortgages for Louise E. Hahe, and the plaintiff succeeding to the latter’s interest seeks in this and another similar action to foreclose them, and to cancel assignments thereof to Remsen, and later assignments through which Rhinehart claims title to them. Mrs. Fint had intrusted the securities- to Roélir, who was her own and'the lawyer for the estate, and by his act they were assigned to Remsen, and by the act of both and to pay their debt to Rhinehart they were assigned to .the Montauk Brewery Company. Rhinehart’s…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Nash v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Stainton v. Jacob Kaiser Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Nahe v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Nahe v. BauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910