Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. James

Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided April 27, 1891No. 140PublishedCited by 15 opinions

No. 140 July Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 1 June Term 1890, Q. S. On May 17,1890, a return was made to tbe court below of an information against George W. James for non-support of his wife and minor child.

Read the full summary

No. 140 July Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 1 June Term 1890, Q. S. On May 17,1890, a return was made to tbe court below of an information against George W. James for non-support of his wife and minor child. On June 6, 1890, after hearing before Pennypacker, J., an order was entered that the defendant pay $2.50 per week for the support of his wife, Anna F. James, and the further sum of $2.00 per week for the support of his minor child, William James, from the date of said order; give security by one or more sureties to the commonwealth, in the sum of $800, for the faithful performance…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

No appeal lies from the Quarter Sessions in desertion cases. This case comes up by writ of certiorari, and we can only examine the regularity of the proceedings. We learn from the record that the plaintiff was charged with desertion upon the oath of his wife; was convicted thereof by the court below, and an appropriate sentence imposed. All this was regular, and we cannot review the case upon its merits.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. LaytonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Commonwealth v. FriedlanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API