Legal Opinion

City of Cimarron v. Midland Water, Light & Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1922No. 23,867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Ford district court; Littleton M. Day, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

The city of Cimarron in 1917 had an electric plant by means of which it provided current for its own use and also for the use of its residents, in furnishing heat, light and power. The plant proving too small for the demands upon it, the city entered into a contract with the Midland Water, Light and Ice Company, of Dodge City, to supply it with electricity for the purposes indicated for fifteen years at 3, 4 and 5 cents per kilowatt hour, according to the quantity used, for the first three years, and 3 cents thereafter. On January 15, 1920,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. City of Worcester v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. State ex rel. City of Sedalia v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. City of Charleston v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1999
  3. Western Distributing Co. v. City of MulvaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API