Legal Opinion

Castro v. Keyes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1992No. 73098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

In 1987 Oklahoma County underwent mandatory revaluation of real property for ad valorem tax purposes. This case is one of many in which a taxpayer’s protest as to the increased valuation could not, by reason of the sheer number of such protests on file, be reached for action by the County Board of Equalization until after the statutory date of adjournment for that Board. 1 Today we hold that a County Board of Equalization possesses authority to adjudicate a timely filed taxpayer protest even though the decision of the Board occurs after the statutory date for adjournment. It…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulfstream Petroleum Corp. v. LaydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Poulos v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. Cantrell v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Prairie Oil Gas Co. v. Cruce, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. KeyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Larry Jones International Ministries, Inc. v. MeansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. George L. Verity Management Development Corp. v. KeyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API