Legal Opinion
Sparrow v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 2013No. 12-CV-1732PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge:
After conducting a preliminary investigation, the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights (OHR) found that there was no probable cause to support appellant Timothy Sparrow’s allegations that appel-lee R.B. Properties: (1) failed to provide him with a reasonable accommodation for his disability; and (2) terminated him in retaliation for requesting a reasonable accommodation. Upon reconsideration at Sparrow’s request, OHR affirmed its initial determination that there was no probable cause. Mr. Sparrow appealed OHR’s decision to the District of Columbia…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ellen Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Rebecca Cravens v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peninsula Regional Medical Center v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Smith v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Chenari v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- DC Dept. of Public Works v. DC Office of Human Rights & Jeffrey DickersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Consiglia Stacey Grove v. Loomis Sayles & Company, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.