Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Lucas

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided February 13, 1974No. A-732102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was submitted to the court on the pleadings and the memo-randa of counsel, under Civil Rule 56. No depositions, *6answers to interrogatories, written admissions, affidavits, transcripts of evidence, or written stipulations of fact were filed. Plaintiffs filed a request for admission of genuineness, attaching two letters thereto, and the defendants did not file any written response thereto, either before or after the 28 days designated as the period within which to reply.

The court has considered the motion for summary judgment on the basis of the pleadings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bilyeu v. Motorists Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bartow v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Mason v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Hall v. Columbus Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. T & S Lumber Co. v. Alta Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Salyers v. BurkhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Kuss Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Jpmorgan Chase Co. v. Indus. Power Gen., 2007-T-0026 (11-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Baird v. HosmerOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API