Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Bracy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1896No. Nos. 9827-(30)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of tbe district court for Hennepin county, in favor of defendant JBracy, entered in pursuance of tbe findings and order of Russell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Tbis action was brought on tbe same contract and to enforce tbe same liability as was that between tbe same parties, reported in 55 Minn. 249, 56 N. W. 826, wherein tbe facts fully appear. In tbe present action, in which defendant Letcher was not served with a summons, nor did be appear, a trial was bad before tbe court without a jury, and on its findings of fact judgment was ordered against plaintiffs.

As might be expected, tbe real question in issue was whether plaintiffs accepted the quitclaim deed, executed and delivered by a third person, as a full compliance with defendants’ contract to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slocum v. BracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cookson v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API