Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Loomis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.— Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This was a joint action against father and son, the latter an infant of about the age of ten years, to recover damages, caused by reason.of an injury to plaintiff, arising from a gunshot wound,, inflicted by the son/ The petition was as follows :

“The plaintiff states that defendant Luther Loomis is the father of Henry Loomis, who is a minor of the age of about ten years, and resides with, and was at times herein stated in custody of, said Luther.
“That the plaintiff, prior to, and on, the tenth day of June, 1889, was in the employment of the defendant as a servant; that, prior to, and on, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Benson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Goetz v. AmbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. Fulkerson v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. SinclairIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davidson v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Stephens v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Gibeline v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Mammerberg v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Summers v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API