Legal Opinion

Kappel v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1968No. Civ. A. 64-1091, 64-1092PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. These two consolidated actions are suits for the recovery of overpayment of individual Federal Income Taxes for the year 1960.

2. Plaintiffs are John F. Kappel and his wife, and William J. Kappel and his wife, each married couple having filed joint United States Income Tax returns for the calendar year 1960, on or before April 15, 1961. The operative facts concern only the husband plaintiffs. References to Plaintiffs hereinafter will refer only to husband plaintiffs.

3. Each of plaintiffs’ 1960 income tax returns reported an overpayment of tax…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Cannistra EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kappel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Albert L. Shipley, Jr. And Evelyn Needham, Formerly Shipley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Kappel v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Cal-Farm Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
  5. Estate of Kappel v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API