Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1942No. 8,255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

The relator, Barnard-Curtiss Company, a Minnesota corporation, is defendant in an action pending in the district court of Granite county, brought by C. A. Metcalf, to recover an amount which he claims as owing to him for work done on a dam construction project. Barnard-Curtiss Company had the con tract for building the dam and Metcalf had been employed ‘and had done work in clearing the reservoir site of timber and brush. Ernest Maehl had likewise been employed in the same work; both had received pay from Barnard-Curtiss as the work progressed. Each made demand on Barnard-Curtiss for a sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gold Creek Mining Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. P. & Pac. Railroad v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. O'Sullivan v. District Court of Tenth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Walsh v. KennedyMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Sullivan v. District Court of Tenth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API