Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp.

New York Court of Claims

Decided September 9, 2008No. Motion No. M-75069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael E. Hudson, J.

Claimant has moved under Court of Claims Act § 10 (8) to treat a timely notice of claim as a claim against Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corporation.

This application raises the issue of whether the provisions of Court of Claims Act § 10 (8) can apply in litigation against Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corporation. For reasons that follow, the court holds that relief under section 10 (8) is inapplicable to claims against that public corporation, notwithstanding that the venue for such litigation has been placed in the Court of Claims.

Claimant seeks to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie County Water Authority v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Holmes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2004
  3. Claim of Tyson v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp.New York Court of Claims · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp.New York Court of Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API