Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Opper, Judge:
Both parties accept the principle of United States v. Kirby Lwnber Co., 284 U. S. 1, as applicable to the present transaction. They differ as to the year in which gain to petitioner would be realized thereunder. The facts are unusual.
Petitioner had outstanding a first mortgage bond issue. It borrowed additional funds on its five-year notes, and in that connection obligated itself to devote part of its earnings to the reduction of the mortgage bonds. -When acquired, however, the bonds were not to be retired, but had to “remain alive” and be delivered to the trustee under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Helvering v. American Chicle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Foley, Exr. v. WassermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Warner Mountains Lumber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Warner Mountains Lumber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947