Legal Opinion
Pullman Co. v. Strang
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 16, 1926No. 16612PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the railway company insist that the court erred in overriding its special demurrer to certain allegations in the petition, to the effect that the plaintiff had been under the care of physicians and was yet “under medical attention,” but at the time of bringing her action was unable to allege the amount of her expenses by reason thereof, which she prayed leave to show later by amendment. By reference to the record it appears that the averments objected to were voluntarily stricken by the plaintiff, by a formal amendment which the court allowed.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Copeland v. DunehooCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. SprayberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Saul Klenberg Co. v. MrozinskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc. v. CagleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- McCorkle v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.