Legal Opinion

Ferris v. Hard

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for leave to amend answer.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

This action was commenced in 1882, and its object is to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants. A trial was had before a referee, who reported in favor of plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. An appeal was thereafter taken to the General Term, where the judgment was affirmed,, and from thence to the Court of Appeals, which court reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial. The opinion delivered in the Court of Appeals shows that its decision was based upon an erroneous ruling of the referee in rejecting certain testimony offered by defendant. In this regard the case is interesting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Troy & Boston Railroad v. TibbitsNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Prindle v. AldrichNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Egert v. WickerNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson & Morgan Co. v. GudewillCity of New York Municipal Court · 1902
  2. Richardson & Morgan Co. v. GudewillCity of New York Municipal Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API