Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Lands

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 5, 1945No. Nos. 763, 766, 779, 783, 786, 789, 790, 793, 803, 806, 813, 819PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

These cases are now before this Court on the question whether the defendant landowners shall be paid interest, raised by motion on the part of plaintiff for judgment in condemnation of defendants’ land, and judgment for the defendants for the sum agreed to in option contracts between plaintiff and defendants, but without interest, and counter motions by defendants substantially like plaintiff’s motion, but asking for interest on the sum remaining undeposited on the contract price, since date of taking by the plaintiff. Like motions appear in each case and are now ruled.

Th…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. United States v. Certain Lands in St. Charles CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
  4. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Sutton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API