Legal Opinion
Leavine v. Belt Automobile Indemnity Ass'n
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 5, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.
-This suit is to reform and enforce a policy of insurance issued by the defendant insurance company to indemnify complainant against loss or damage by theft, *554robbery or pilferage of an automobile. The bill alleges that because of inadvertence and mistake, which were mutual and common to both parties to the contract, there was a misdescription of the automobile in the application for and policy of insurance; that the automobile owned by complainant and intended to be insured was afterwards stolen and complainant, as a result, sustained a loss against which he is indemnified by the contract.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phenix Insurance v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Mitchell v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Rosenthal v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Shone v. BellmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Fidelity Phenix Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Walker v. CloseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Schmidt v. KibbenSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- The Century Tr. Co. v. the Allison Realty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Warrington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1926