Legal Opinion

(PC) Tate v. Nakashyan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 2, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00624Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEREK TATE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00624-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 13 v. (Doc. 42) 14 DIANA NAKASHYAN, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 15 Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT 16 OF MOTION 17 (Doc. 56) 18 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE 19 (Doc. 59) 20 21 Plaintiff Derek Tate is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Soetaert v. Kansas City Coca Cola Bottling Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  4. United States v. GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API