Ex Parte Groom
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
Informations were filed in the district court of Rosebud county charging Thomas Groom with the crime of receiving stolen property belonging to the United States. His arrest and imprisonment followed. He applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus to secure his discharge from custody, on the ground that since the property in question belongs to the United States, the state court is without jurisdiction and that the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over the crimes.
Section 101, Title 18, U. S. C. A., provides: “Whoever shall receive, conceal, or aid in concealing, or shall have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cross v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Weil v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. StevensMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Sexton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AkersMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. DaughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1979