Legal Opinion

Allied Veterans of the World, Inc. v. Seminole County

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 6, 2011No. 8:11-cv-00155PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN ANTOON II, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and Intervenor-Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of Ordinance 2011-1 (“the Ordinance”), which was passed by Defendant Seminole County, Florida (“the County”) on January 11, 2011 and which bans “simulated gambling devices” in the County. (Ordinance, Ex. A to Doc. 1, at 7). A temporary restraining order was entered on February 1, 2011. (Doc. 8). Currently pending are Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction 1 (Doc. 17) and Intervenor-Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 18). 2 As discussed below, both motions…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. GIFT SURPLUS, LLC v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA EX REL. ROY COOPER, GOVERNORDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  3. Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Sandhill Amusements v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API