Legal Opinion

McGlinn's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1935No. Appeals, 300 and 301PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

We are required in these appeals to construe two paragraphs of the will of John McGlinn, the fourth and the sixth. In order to make their construction and purpose simpler and more clear much of the wording will be elided.

The point for determination is whether John J. Mc-Glinn, Jr., a son, took a vested or contingent interest in the share of the estate given in the first instance to a daughter, Regina, or, stated in a different way, whether John’s children (the appellants) are the recipients of his share, since he predecased Regina, which happens if the gift to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Feeney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Neel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Packer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Rosengarten v. AshtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Manderson v. LukensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hope EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Vandergrift EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Haydon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Shaw's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Goodin's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API