Legal Opinion
Romero v. Paragon Steel Division, Portec, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1982No. Docket 53893PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an accelerated judgment of dismissal based upon application of the statute of limitations. GCR 1963, 116.1(5). In analyzing plaintiff’s wrongful discharge claim, the trial court concluded that the applicable statute of limitations was that barring tort actions three years after their accrual. MCL 600.5805(8); MSA 27A.5805(8). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by relying on the tort limitations period.
This suit was instituted under § 301 of the federal Labor Management Relations Act, 29 USC 185, which allows individuals to sue their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Glowacki v. Motor Wheel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Barry v. Detroit Terminal RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Romero v. Paragon Steel Division, Portec, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Manley v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983