Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Wagner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1899No. 18,013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Erom the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The special verdict of the jury discloses the following facts: One Cunningham was the duly constituted foreman of a gang of ten or twelve men, common laborers, of whom the appellee was one, all, including Cunningham, employes of appellant and engaged in loading car trucks, composed of four wheels, axles, and gearing, and weighing about 2,500 pounds, upon a flat car for transportation. By the method pursued, which was the usual and ordinary way, the trucks were placed upon the rails occupied by the flat ear to be loaded about fifty feet distant; then two wooden skids fifteen feet long, made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ezekiel v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Rosenplaenter v. . RoessleNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. City Council of Sheffield v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Stanley v. GadsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1836

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. CharmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Thacker v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. BerkesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. KaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API