United States v. Porter
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NEVILLE, District Judge.
Defendant above named was charged by an indictment filed November 7, 1967, with having illegally sold, bartered and exchanged narcotics without proper written order, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a). At the time set for arraignment, defendant’s counsel moved the court to defer the same so that defendant could be accorded the benefit of the recently enacted Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act, which became law November 8,1966. The Act is sufficiently new (and has so recently been activated by an appropriation of funds) that no published court decisions…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Eugene H. PinkneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- United States v. Sherman Lee HartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- United States v. Jude Thaddeus MastersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987