Legal Opinion

Brown v. Johnson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1942No. 6532PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, Julius Jamerson and William H. Brown, in this action seek to have set aside and annulled certain mineral conveyances affecting land in which they are interested and to recover royalties paid to other persons as a result of those transfers.

Jamerson, on February 12, 1937, executed an instrument in favor of "Milton E. Johns, attorney at law," wherein the following was stipulated:

"That the said Julius Jamerson (Jamison) has contracted with the said Milton E. Johns to have all the fraudulent titles and claims cancelled or removed from the records of Bossier Parish, Louisiana, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Waller v. ColvinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Baird v. Atlas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Cole v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wells v. JosephSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Ridgedell v. Succession of KuyrkendallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Voelkel v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Thomas v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Martin Fuel Dist., Inc. v. Trans Gulf Fuel, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API