Legal Opinion

Fabisiak v. Empire Steel Partition Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— -Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. We are of opinion that upon the record in this ease the infant plaintiff was not upon defendant’s premises at the time of the accident, with the defendant’s consent, permission or knowledge, and as *666to it was not a licensee. Defendant’s employee, in sending plaintiff upon a personal errand, was not acting within the scope of Ms employment or in furtherance of defendant’s interest. (Muller v. Hillenbrand, 227 N. Y. 448; Rolfe v. Hewitt, Id. 486; Mott v. Consumers’ Ice Company, 73 id. 543.)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muller v. . HillenbrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poock v. StrahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API