Dufrene v. Anderson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Douglas county. Action to set aside a fraudulent conveyance. Tried below before Fawcett, J. Judgment for defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
Albert, C.
On tbe 10th day of October, 1894, the defendant L. M. Anderson executed two conveyances, covering separate parcels of real estate belonging to him, to his son, the defendant Arthur L. Anderson. These conveyances were not filed for record until January 14, 1896. At and prior to the date of such conveyances, the grantor was indebted to Alfred R. Dufrene on a note secured by mortgage on other real estate. The mortgage was foreclosed in 1895, and a deficiency judgment rendered in favor of the mortgagee and against the mortgagor, in 1896, for $1,800. Afterward the mortgagee died, and in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Vielehr v. MaloneNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Hadley v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Kissick Const. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of WahooDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Filley v. MancusoNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.