Legal Opinion

Fusinski v. Robertson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 30, 1980No. 80-1232PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

The appellee, as plaintiff in the trial court, brought an action against the appellant-defendant, seeking recovery for injuries occasioned when he was on the appellant’s premises as a business invitee and was bitten by a dog.

The case was tried non-jury. The trial judge found for the plaintiff, found that the defendant was the owner of the dog, and that the defendant had posted signs in accordance with Florida Statutes. We reverse.

The trial court having found that the signs were posted in accordance with the Statutes, and in fact the record indicates that there were numerous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MoxleySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Romfh v. BermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Rattet v. DUAL SEC. SYSTEMS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Flick v. MalinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stickney v. Belcher Yacht, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Fusinski v. WaltersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API