Insura Property & Casualty Co. v. Steele Opinion text corrected 11/25/03
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chapman
The plaintiff, Insura Property and Casualty Company (Insura), appeals from an order of the Madison County trial court ordering it to provide underinsured-vehicle coverage to an insured who was injured while riding as a passenger on an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) designed primarily for off-road use. On appeal, Insura contends that the trial court erred in finding that its policy provision excluding coverage for off-road vehicles was unenforceable under the Illinois Insurance Code provision mandating underinsured-motorist coverage (215 ILCS 5/143a — 2(4) (West 2000)). We reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Gibbs v. Madison Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoladaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Stepec v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Toastmaster, Inc. v. MummertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Travis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022