Legal Opinion

Insura Property & Casualty Co. v. Steele Opinion text corrected 11/25/03

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 6, 2003No. 5-02-0716 RelPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chapman

The plaintiff, Insura Property and Casualty Company (Insura), appeals from an order of the Madison County trial court ordering it to provide underinsured-vehicle coverage to an insured who was injured while riding as a passenger on an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) designed primarily for off-road use. On appeal, Insura contends that the trial court erred in finding that its policy provision excluding coverage for off-road vehicles was unenforceable under the Illinois Insurance Code provision mandating underinsured-motorist coverage (215 ILCS 5/143a — 2(4) (West 2000)). We reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gibbs v. Madison Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoladaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Stepec v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Toastmaster, Inc. v. MummertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API