Legal Opinion
Delarosa v. Besser Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 19, 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*589The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3), since there was no clear showing that the plaintiffs failure to comply with the appellants’ discovery demand was willful and contumacious (see CPLR 3126; ACME ANC Corp. v Read, 55 AD3d 854, 855 [2008]; Myung Sum, Suh v Jung Ja Kim, 51 AD3d 883 [2008]; Manko v Lenox Hill Hosp., 44 AD3d 1014 [2007]; Resnick v Schwarzkopf, 41 AD3d 573 [2007]). The plaintiff substantially, albeit tardily, complied with the discovery demand (see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mironer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Resnick v. SchwarzkopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- ACME ANC Corp. v. ReadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Manko v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Myung Sum Suh v. Jung Ja KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weller v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Palmieri v. Piano Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- New York Timber, LLC v. Seneca CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Pesce v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Perla v. Daytree Custom Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.