Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1974No. 2239Published

1ConcurrenceBoochever, J.

J., joins.

I concur with Justice Erwin’s opinion but do not agree that “[wjhere there is a variance between a court’s oral ruling on a motion for summary judgment and written findings prepared by the prevailing party, the oral ruling controls.” The written findings and conclusions should be the product of greater deliberation, and the general rule is that where formal findings of fact and conclusions of law filed pursuant to statute conflict with statements of fact made in an opinion or memorandum of decision, the formal findings prevail.1 However, facts stated in a memorandum that are not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. KayWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. City of Anchorage v. StewardAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Levine v. Randolph Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  5. Coolidge v. RuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API