Legal Opinion

Cutsinge v. Ballard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1888No. 13,244PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Julia A. Cutsinger and others, as plaintiffs, alleged in their complaint that they were tenants in common with John Ballard and his co-defendants, of certain real estate in Johnson county, of which Taylor Ballard, their common ancestor, died seized. Prayer for partition according to the respective interests of the parties.

*94The defendant John Ballard set up by way of cross-complaint that he was in possession, and was the equitable owner under a contract made with his father, Taylor Ballard, in his lifetime, of a certain described tract of land which was embraced in the description of the real…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Freeman v. . FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Purcell v. MinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Summerlot v. SummerlotIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rennert v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Claise v. BernardiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Wilson v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API