Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, with whom HOFFMAN, District Judge, joins,
concurring:
I concur in the opinion of the court solely because the previous decision of this court in Demarinis v. Donovan, 728 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir.1984), compels this result. Were this a case of first impression, I would readily adopt the analysis employed by Judge Farris in his dissent in Demarinis. Id. at 1267-69. Because the Redwood Act was intended to benefit persons “thrown out of work” as a result of the park’s expansion, 124 Cong.Rec. 7799 (March 21,1978), it is illogical to equate the term “layoff” with the term…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John E. Demarinis v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Miranda v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973