State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Schara
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
This appeal poses a basic question that, surprisingly, has not heretofore been adjudicated in this court: Within what time limit must a tortfeasor who has settled with an injured person commence an action for contribution against a joint tortfeasor? The answer to the question is dependent upon when the cause of action accrues and what limitation statute, if any, applies subsequent to the date of the accrual.
Wisconsin cases lead to the conclusion that a cause of action for contribution is separate and distinct from the underlying cause of action whether that underlying cause sounds in contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Ainsworth v. BergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Farmers MA Ins. Co. v. Milwaukee A. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Bushnell v. BushnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Brown v. HaertelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kallas Millwork Corp. v. Square D Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Lincenberg v. IssenSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.