Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2006No. 43248PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether presenting a stolen credit card, without the card being processed or goods obtained, is sufficient use to establish fraudulent use of a credit card.1 We conclude that presentment alone does not constitute use and reverse Moore’s conviction for fraudulent use of a credit card.

*30However, we conclude that sufficient evidence supports Moore’s conviction for possession of a credit card without the cardholder’s consent; that the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Moore possessed the requisite intent for burglary; that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gallego v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Domingues v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LuceroNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lamb v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Abbott v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. Javier C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Thompson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API