Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kentucky Kingdom Amusement Co. v. Belo Kentucky, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2005No. 2002-SC-0693-DG, 2002-SC-0697-DG, 2003-SC-0634-DGPublished

1DissentCooper, Justice

I concur in the majority opinion only insofar as it reinstates the trial court’s judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) with respect to the $1,000,000.00 verdict for reputation damages. However, I conclude that Belo Kentucky, Inc., d/b/a WHAS-TV (“WHAS”) was also entitled to a JNOV with respect to the remainder of the damages because the statements deemed defamatory by the jury were absolutely privileged. Aternatively, WHAS is entitled to a new trial because the trial court’s jury instructions did not accurately state the law of the case. Furthermore, the punitive damage award was…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API