Legal Opinion

State v. . Hassell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896Published

INDICTMENT for conspiracy tried before Graham, J., and a jury at December Special Term, 1895, of JoNES Superior Court on removal from the Superior Court of Carteret county. The same objections to the jurisdiction were made as were interposed in the case of State v. Turner, at this Term. The defendants objected to the trial on account of defects in the transcript of the case from Carteret county. The court then requested the defendants to point out the defects complained of.

Read the full summary

INDICTMENT for conspiracy tried before Graham, J., and a jury at December Special Term, 1895, of JoNES Superior Court on removal from the Superior Court of Carteret county. The same objections to the jurisdiction were made as were interposed in the case of State v. Turner, at this Term. The defendants objected to the trial on account of defects in the transcript of the case from Carteret county. The court then requested the defendants to point out the defects complained of. Defendants replied that their counsel had not time to inspect the record carefully and could not do so. The objection…

1Opinion of the Court

AveRY, J.:

The assignments of error are substantially the same as those discussed in State v. Turner, and State v. Noe, at this Term. It may not be improper to add, however, that one exception, which was made in all of the cases, seemed to be so clearly untenable that we have forborne in other appeals to discuss it, but in deference to the opinion of counsel it may be well to pass upon it here.

Objection was made to the transcript, of the record from the county of Beaufort, sent under the order of removal. But. counsel declined, when requested to do so, to ¡mint out or specify in what respects…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API