Legal Opinion

Wafford v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1995No. 95CA0383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge STERNBERG.

The claimant, Tanya M. Wafford, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel (Panel) which disqualified her from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. Her principal contention is that the hearing officer had a duty to develop the case, and that the duty was violated. We disagree and, therefore, affirm.

Claimant quit her employment and applied for unemployment benefits. At the hearing, claimant and employer offered conflicting testimony concerning the reasons she resigned. In resolving the conflicting evidence, the hearing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Shaw v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. QFD Accessories, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chris Crazy Trader, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Jones v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API